Will Prowse published a three-way test on 8 August of large-format 48V batteries — EG4, Ruixu Lithi, and a Yixiang budget pack — each roughly 300lb and about the size of three server-rack batteries stacked. The interesting result isn't which one won. It's where the failures came from.
Capacity first. Two of the packs were three years old, and Prowse had treated them very differently: one took roughly 12MWh of forced charge/discharge cycling, the other was barely cycled at all. Both then sat uncharged in a metal building in Las Vegas through two summers. Measured capacity differed by 0.6%. That's an empirical data point for something we covered as theory in the 1 June background on calendar vs cycle aging: for LFP in normal solar service, the clock does more damage than the cycling.
Then the 200A continuous cycle test. The Yixiang pack failed early — but not because of its cells. Prowse pulled it apart, put a thermal camera on it, and found the internal fuse at 220°F, hot enough to raise the temperature of the adjacent cells and trip the BMS. Bypassing the fuse fixed it. A second, horizontal Yixiang unit had no fuse at all, showed uniform cell temperatures, and still tripped early — the BMS turned out to be sharply sensitive right around 200A. Dropped to 198A, it matched the Ruixu.
The EG4 held up best, and Prowse attributes that to layout rather than cells: its BMS sits in a larger compartment, further from both the cells and the breaker, so heat soak from the pack doesn't reach the electronics. Worth keeping in proportion — all three are rated 140A continuous, all three pass comfortably at that rate, and Prowse notes the MOSFETs stay below 40°C through back-to-back cycling. In none of the tests did the cells themselves get hot. The 200A run is a test of everything around the cells, and that's exactly where these packs differ.