FarOutRide published a bench comparison of the two 14-inch roof fans most van builders are choosing between — the Maxxfan Deluxe and the AirPlus — with the page carrying an update stamp of 5 September. The method is worth stating because it is the part vendors skip: aluminium flashing formed into a Ø315mm cylinder to force the discharge through a known area, an anemometer in the duct, and airflow calculated as velocity (m/s) × area (m²) × 2,118.88. Everything measured at 12.8V, lid fully open, exhaust mode. Noise taken at 6in and 2ft.
The headline number is the gap between the label and the duct. The AirPlus specification label claims 1,765 CFM (3,000 m³/h). Measured flat out, it moves 495 CFM drawing 22.8W — about 28% of the printed figure. FarOutRide does not report finding any documentation of where 1,765 came from, and neither did we.
The more useful comparison is the one that needs no interpolation. The Maxxfan on speed 5 moves 561 CFM on 12W. That is more air than the AirPlus produces at its maximum, on roughly half the power. Flat out the Maxxfan reaches 809 CFM at 39W. Put in the units that size a bank: eight hours of AirPlus at full speed is about 182Wh; eight hours of Maxxfan at speed 5, moving more air, is about 96Wh.
One reconciliation we owe readers. We published FarOutRide's Maxxfan figures once already, in July, from the in-van Quad-Shunt: 45W at speed 10, 17W at speed 5, 2W at the lowest setting. The bench rig now gives 39W, 12W and 1.5W at the same three positions — consistently lower by around 15–25%. Neither set is wrong. The van figures include the real install's resistance and whatever the supply voltage actually sagged to under load; the bench figures are a clean 12.8V into free discharge. That the same fan, same tester and same speed settings produce a 6W spread at the top of the dial is the whole argument of this week's Background in miniature.
There is a trap in the per-setting tables that is worth naming. "Speed 5" is not an operating point — it is a position on a dial, and two vendors' dials have nothing to do with each other. Comparing fans setting-by-setting makes the AirPlus look efficient (4.47W for 314 CFM at its own speed 5). Comparing them at equal airflow reverses the result. Any fan efficiency claim that does not state the CFM it was measured at is not a claim about efficiency.
One structural detail raises the stakes. FarOutRide identifies the AirPlus as an OEM product — Jiangsu Sanjo, model 3J-PF — sold under ProBreeze, Plus Fan, Carbest Vanvent, Vechline, Belluna and GoCamp depending on the retailer. The 1,765 CFM figure is not one brand's overstatement; it travels with the tooling.
In fairness: this is one tester, one sample of each fan, and a free-discharge rig rather than a laboratory. FarOutRide chose the AirPlus for their own build anyway — it has a built-in blind, lights and a radio remote, and no history of motor squeal. Prices as of August 2026 run $300–$475 for the Maxxfan and $350–$390 for the AirPlus in the US. See this week's Background for why nobody is required to publish a number you can check.