JiKong's V22 Inverter-BMS is 20–40% cheaper than the V19, noticeably smaller, and has a Wi-Fi module. It also balances at 0.6A instead of 2A, and that one number is the whole story. On 11 September Andy at Off-Grid Garage published the first real-world charge through one, and the result is not close.
The test pack is a 16S 100Ah battery — small, by the standards of anyone building a shelf. He reset the BMS to LFP defaults, set a 5mV balance trigger and a 3.45V balance start voltage, and charged at roughly 21A from an adjustable supply set to 55.6V. The balancer engaged on schedule at 3.447V on cell 1. Then cell 1 kept climbing: 3.5V, 3.58V, and on to 3.602V, with the pack-wide spread growing to about 170mV while total charge current had already tapered to 2.3A. After one hour forty minutes the spread was 50mV. At one hour fifty-five it was 42mV and, in his words, "the needle is not moving much anymore."
The comparison that matters is against JK's own previous generation. Andy's own shelf runs V19 BMSes with the 2A supercapacitor balancer on packs of roughly 300Ah — three times the capacity of the test battery — and he sets a half-hour absorption window, which is enough. The V22 could not finish a pack a third of that size in nearly four times the window.
The balance method is not simply a smaller version of the old one. The V19 shuttles charge cell-to-cell through a supercapacitor. The V22 discharges the high cell into a transformer and returns the energy to the whole pack — Andy measured the return at around 39mA back into the pack. JK markets this as "active pack balancing." As an architecture it is defensible; at 0.6A it does not have the authority to correct a runner while the pack is still absorbing.
JK's explanation, relayed by Andy, is straightforward and worth repeating without editorialising: the Chinese domestic BMS market is fiercely price-competitive, JK needed a cheaper part, and the supercapacitor bank was expensive. The balance current is identical — 0.6A — whether you buy the 100A, 150A or 200A version, because it is a property of the balancer, not the pack.
Two things this is not. It is not a replacement: JK is keeping the V19 in production, and the V22 is an additional, cheaper line. And it is not a firmware regression that can be patched — this is hardware. His verdict is unusually blunt for him: "this is certainly not a BMS I would recommend."
There is also an integration cost that falls on pack builders rather than buyers. The V22's comms board carries five DIP switches instead of four, and the smaller footprint does not land on the V19's mounting points. Andy had to 3D-print an adapter plate and file the front-panel cutout wider to fit one into an existing battery. Anyone assembling packs around this BMS is re-tooling a front panel, and the part that reaches the end buyer will still say "JK BMS" on it. That is this week's Background.